Satire. Every score on this site is made up. The tweets are real.Read the disclaimer →
Trust Me Bro
Get VerifiedContribute
ModelsBenchmarksIncidentsIn the WildMethodologyChart Crime Studio
TMB-2026-0008··Cherry-picking (alleged)
🤝🤝🤝Disputed

The 98.2%

Subject: Qwen3.8 27B derivative

Claim

A headline "98.2%" figure relative to Qwen3.8 27B.

Finding

A widely shared rebuttal called the figure "cherry-picked across 14 static benchmarks" after the model was given "a real agent job right away". The rebuttal itself is also n = 1, which we note in the interest of balance.

Timeline

  1. 18 Sept 2026
    "98.2% of Qwen3.8 27B my ass."@superalesha · ♥ 2.2K ↗
  2. 18 Sept 2026
    "Cherry-picked across 14 static benchmarks."@superalesha · ♥ 1.3K ↗

Primary sources

The posts this entry is based on, embedded as published.

superalesha
Alexey Fateev
@superalesha
Link to tweet
98.2% of Qwen3.8 27B my ass. I got hyped and gave it a real agent job right away. Build me an FPS in three.js, 6 hours on a 3090. My most standard and default prompt that I always use. It spent the first 32K tokens on a plan without writing a single file, then shipped a black
♥ 2.2KOpen on X ↗
superalesha
Alexey Fateev
@superalesha
Link to tweet
Look, @PrismML, you guys are doing cool work, not gonna deny that. But you're creating a real problem here and setting the whole Local AI community up for failure. You overhyped this way too hard. That "98.2%" claim is cherry-picked across 14 static benchmarks, running in full
Look, @PrismML, you guys are doing cool work, not gonna deny that. But you're creating a real problem here and setting the whole Local AI community up for failure. You overhyped this way too hard. That "98.2%" claim is cherry-picked across 14 static benchmarks, running in full https://t.co/hE6dPwbfAv
♥ 1.3KOpen on X ↗